I have no sympathy for people who marry illegal aliens. They are free to join their spouse in their native countries.
We can't continue to accept anyone who decides to violate their visa or just enters the country without one.
If we don't do the things necessary to be a nation, we will no longer be one.
All one has to do as look around the world or at our past history to see what the results are from unrestrained immigration, particularly illegal immigration. Two dominant cultures will eventually clash. Wars are just a grown-up version of gang warfare and protecting one's turf.
There is this myth going around that democratic governments unite people together, however, what holds a nation together are common values and a common culture. Countries without common values and culture are held together by dictators. Remove the dictator and chaos reigns.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Billions and Billions
"Without them and the $3.56 billion the tourism and hospitality industry pumps into the local economy, Indianapolis would be just another decaying post-industrial city surrounded by former cornfields of two-story tract homes full of people with nothing to do."
I am not sure what the $3.56 billion consists of, but I do know (according to Stats Indiana (http://www.stats.indiana.edu/profiles/pr18097.html), the total earnings from accommodations, food service, arts, entertainment, recreation and retail trade only made up 9.4% (3.4 billion) of the total earnings in Marion County. And of course, the average wages of these sectors are amongst the lowest. Obviously, only a portion of that is attributable to tourism.
What Ketzenbeger should be doing is providing a real analysis of the minor role that the convention center, etc. actually play in the local economy and contrast that to the percentage of subsidies (tax abatement and tifs, etc. provided to this sector of the economy.
I am not sure what the $3.56 billion consists of, but I do know (according to Stats Indiana (http://www.stats.indiana.edu/profiles/pr18097.html), the total earnings from accommodations, food service, arts, entertainment, recreation and retail trade only made up 9.4% (3.4 billion) of the total earnings in Marion County. And of course, the average wages of these sectors are amongst the lowest. Obviously, only a portion of that is attributable to tourism.
What Ketzenbeger should be doing is providing a real analysis of the minor role that the convention center, etc. actually play in the local economy and contrast that to the percentage of subsidies (tax abatement and tifs, etc. provided to this sector of the economy.
Tech workers
I don't buy the argument that there is currently a shortage of technically skilled people. If no one remembers, we had a technological boom, even if only a false one, during which there never was any evidence of a shortage of workers. After the tech bust, what happened? Did all of these workers disappear? No, they haven't; they still exist and they are looking for work. But under the new paradigm of cheap labor uber alles, a lot of lips are flapping about the need to obtain more cheap labor by lying about the availability of American workers. Only if and when Gates provides verifiable data, will I consider believing a word he says about this issue.
However, having an immigration policy that is based on attracting highly talented foreign-born workers is an acceptable policy to add to, not to replace American workers. It is surely a much better policy than our intentional policy of not enforcing our immigration laws and permitting millions of poor, uneducated people to flood into our welfare-laden society.
And of course, our entitlement laden, easy money society provides so many disincentives for developing the proper work ethic needed for the study of math and science. There really has to be societal attitude changes before we can really turn the corner in our elementary, secondary and post-secondary educational systems
However, having an immigration policy that is based on attracting highly talented foreign-born workers is an acceptable policy to add to, not to replace American workers. It is surely a much better policy than our intentional policy of not enforcing our immigration laws and permitting millions of poor, uneducated people to flood into our welfare-laden society.
And of course, our entitlement laden, easy money society provides so many disincentives for developing the proper work ethic needed for the study of math and science. There really has to be societal attitude changes before we can really turn the corner in our elementary, secondary and post-secondary educational systems
Multiculturalism
Providing foot sinks is pandering to religious sect and smacks of the multiculturalism that is slowly destroying this country. A counrty can not survive with multiple culturals. It most have one dominant culture. All our problems today are related to people not wanting to assimilate into our culture, whether it be the variety of people, black, white, hispanic, etc. who embrace ghetto culture and refuse to fully participate in the broader culture.
Multiculturalism says we should provide foot sinks and that they should expect foot sinks. Assimilation says that one needs to make a choice - if footwashing is a problem, than the individual needs to figure out where they can wash their feet without impacting the broader culture.
Multiculturalism says that I should be able to do what I want to fulfill my needs regardless of how it impacts the broader culture.
Assimilation sayst that I must consider the broader culture when deciding how I practice my religion and conduct my daily life.
Multiculturalism says we should provide foot sinks and that they should expect foot sinks. Assimilation says that one needs to make a choice - if footwashing is a problem, than the individual needs to figure out where they can wash their feet without impacting the broader culture.
Multiculturalism says that I should be able to do what I want to fulfill my needs regardless of how it impacts the broader culture.
Assimilation sayst that I must consider the broader culture when deciding how I practice my religion and conduct my daily life.
Illegal immigration bill
Supporters of Senate Bill 335 are not motivated by race; we are motivated by reality. We are motivated by the reality of the concerted effort to reduce labor costs in everyway imaginable, including the exploitation of illegal aliens, workers in domestic and foreign sweatshops, forced and prison labor camps, and child labor.
Illegal immigration, unfortunately, is just one part of the sordid nature of our economy that those who reap direct benefits from cheap labor or cheap prices (not for long with the falling dollar) chose to ignore.
What also is ignored is the fact that billions of dollars earned by illegal aliens is siphoned from our economy and infused into foreign economies, thereby bolstering their economies while diminishing ours. Meanwhile, the social welfare system of the United States provides an extra incentive for illegal immigrants to violate our laws since comparable safety nets do not exist in their countries. Our social welfare system subsidizes those entities that exploit those workers and flaunt U.S. immigration law.
We can not continue to tolerate the illegal residency of those who decide to violate their visa or enter our country without one. We must decide whether we will be a nation that focuses on “the general Welfare” of “We the People” as specified in the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States, or whether we continue to follow the path of Corporations uber alles.
Senate Bill 335 is just a small step to indicate to the Federal Government that the citizens and resident aliens of the State of Indiana will not continue to tolerate the subversion of our laws and the exploitation of our overly generous welfare system by those who seek to abuse them. It also seeks to ensure that illegal alien criminals, regardless of where they originate from, are identified when and wherever possible. Is that too much to ask?
Illegal immigration, unfortunately, is just one part of the sordid nature of our economy that those who reap direct benefits from cheap labor or cheap prices (not for long with the falling dollar) chose to ignore.
What also is ignored is the fact that billions of dollars earned by illegal aliens is siphoned from our economy and infused into foreign economies, thereby bolstering their economies while diminishing ours. Meanwhile, the social welfare system of the United States provides an extra incentive for illegal immigrants to violate our laws since comparable safety nets do not exist in their countries. Our social welfare system subsidizes those entities that exploit those workers and flaunt U.S. immigration law.
We can not continue to tolerate the illegal residency of those who decide to violate their visa or enter our country without one. We must decide whether we will be a nation that focuses on “the general Welfare” of “We the People” as specified in the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States, or whether we continue to follow the path of Corporations uber alles.
Senate Bill 335 is just a small step to indicate to the Federal Government that the citizens and resident aliens of the State of Indiana will not continue to tolerate the subversion of our laws and the exploitation of our overly generous welfare system by those who seek to abuse them. It also seeks to ensure that illegal alien criminals, regardless of where they originate from, are identified when and wherever possible. Is that too much to ask?
Stimulus bill
The recently passed stimulus bill is a symptom of our economic problems. Because we refuse to reduce government spending, we borrow money from foreign governments and inflate the money supply (and pretend there is low inflation) to fund our government, our illegitimate war and consumer spending. Instead of our government and citizens admitting their collective addiction to overspending, the government, at our urging, has decided to rain dollars down upon us to cure our economic ills. Of course, other spending will not be reduced; so, thank Communist China for your check.
Our economy and our federal, state and local governments are in trouble because we believe that we can base our economy on consumerism, and somehow believe that contrary to our past and every other emerging economy, we can prosper without having a vibrant manufacturing sector. In other words, we believe that saving, investment, capital formation and production can be replaced by borrowing, spending and importing. Meanwhile the dollar is sinking (meaning those foreign-made goods will no longer be as cheap) and our trade deficit grows ever larger as we pretend that the value of the dollar has no relationship to the cost of imported oil.
Of course, what was deemed to be a positive impact of these policies, the recent phony real estate bubble economy, is, in fact, a symptom of the problem. The policy of inflating the money supply by maintaining artificially low interest rates, combined with lax lending standards and the perverted use of ARMs, interest-only loans and negative amortization ARMs helped feed the hunger of slobbering speculators, while we either jealously watched or joined in. Now, all of those involved in the “party” want to be bailed out with principal reductions, interest-rate freezes and the like. So, we want to reward those who engaged in speculation and took a risk or who borrowed against equity that really didn’t exist, while those who saved for consumer purchases and purchased homes based on sound financial principles pay for it, like all unnecessary government debt, for years to come.
I have a dream that one day we will return to a “real” economy, instead of one based on the exploitation of illegal aliens, domestic and foreign sweatshops, ridiculously easy credit, massive personal and government debt, a devalued dollar, phony government inflation and employment data, financial machinations and trade deficits. I only hope that it happens by choice, otherwise, it will be a long painful transition back to sanity.
Our economy and our federal, state and local governments are in trouble because we believe that we can base our economy on consumerism, and somehow believe that contrary to our past and every other emerging economy, we can prosper without having a vibrant manufacturing sector. In other words, we believe that saving, investment, capital formation and production can be replaced by borrowing, spending and importing. Meanwhile the dollar is sinking (meaning those foreign-made goods will no longer be as cheap) and our trade deficit grows ever larger as we pretend that the value of the dollar has no relationship to the cost of imported oil.
Of course, what was deemed to be a positive impact of these policies, the recent phony real estate bubble economy, is, in fact, a symptom of the problem. The policy of inflating the money supply by maintaining artificially low interest rates, combined with lax lending standards and the perverted use of ARMs, interest-only loans and negative amortization ARMs helped feed the hunger of slobbering speculators, while we either jealously watched or joined in. Now, all of those involved in the “party” want to be bailed out with principal reductions, interest-rate freezes and the like. So, we want to reward those who engaged in speculation and took a risk or who borrowed against equity that really didn’t exist, while those who saved for consumer purchases and purchased homes based on sound financial principles pay for it, like all unnecessary government debt, for years to come.
I have a dream that one day we will return to a “real” economy, instead of one based on the exploitation of illegal aliens, domestic and foreign sweatshops, ridiculously easy credit, massive personal and government debt, a devalued dollar, phony government inflation and employment data, financial machinations and trade deficits. I only hope that it happens by choice, otherwise, it will be a long painful transition back to sanity.
Military bases
I am not sure whether we spend enough or not, but we generally end up spending too much of what we do spend, particularly in areas with little or no significant population growth, on new infrastructure for people and businesses who choose to relocate, while neglecting the maintenance of existing infrastructure. Then, of course, the cycle repeats itself.
We probably spend too much on the military (we probably just spend too much in general) and, of course, those expenditures become important to U.S. localities and many become dependent on them just as individuals become dependent on entitlement programs. And the economic benefits are also one of the same reasons (though a more sensible one), many countries are willing to host American bases. Of course, many people in those countries as well as neighboring countries oppose those bases. While it is arguable that bases are needed outside of the U.S., it becomes a little more difficult to argue that 700+ are needed. Supposedly, there is going to be a redeployment of many of the 200,000 troops on those bases, possibly leading to the elimination of some of them. But it appears that we are adding bases in other areas like Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikstan, which has, of course, made Russia very happy. Imagine if Russia had bases in Mexico or Cuba (oh, yeah, they sort of tried that once). Anyway, unless we, as a nation decide that our military role is much more limited than the current and past administrations have believed, there will be little change in our military spending. And of course, if the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war continues to be our modus operandi, the military budget will continue to rise, and even more local economies will be dependent upon it.
We probably spend too much on the military (we probably just spend too much in general) and, of course, those expenditures become important to U.S. localities and many become dependent on them just as individuals become dependent on entitlement programs. And the economic benefits are also one of the same reasons (though a more sensible one), many countries are willing to host American bases. Of course, many people in those countries as well as neighboring countries oppose those bases. While it is arguable that bases are needed outside of the U.S., it becomes a little more difficult to argue that 700+ are needed. Supposedly, there is going to be a redeployment of many of the 200,000 troops on those bases, possibly leading to the elimination of some of them. But it appears that we are adding bases in other areas like Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikstan, which has, of course, made Russia very happy. Imagine if Russia had bases in Mexico or Cuba (oh, yeah, they sort of tried that once). Anyway, unless we, as a nation decide that our military role is much more limited than the current and past administrations have believed, there will be little change in our military spending. And of course, if the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war continues to be our modus operandi, the military budget will continue to rise, and even more local economies will be dependent upon it.
City fixing problems
Consolidating propeties and selling them as a block would only work if contiguous properties are available, and many times that is not the case. So, eminent domain would have to be used by the city. The city needs to stop trying to do things that it can not do. City government throws ideas at the wall and sees what sticks. They feel that they are succesful when they make an effort, however, the effort they need to make is to stay focused on the issues at hand, mainly public safety and infrastructure maintenance and repair.
Any investment that is not market driven is likely to be a bad long-term investment. The city needs to enforce existing laws and go after owners who do not maintatin their properties, whether it be the banks, HUD, corporations or individuals. The city should provide leadership and help each neighborhood help itself to enhance its quality of life. But the city, as well as real estate developers needs to stop pretending that they can create homeowners out of thin air. Instead, the message should be to citizens that homeownership requires a personal financial commitment, not just relaxed lending standards. If all of these homes are vacant and foreclosed, there must be a surplus of housing and in many cases, the homes and/or neighborhoods are not desirible. If so, no amount of government intervention is going to change that fact. The best that the government can do is to focus on improving the quality of life for the remaining residents and ridding these communities of domestic criminals and illegal alien criminals.
Any investment that is not market driven is likely to be a bad long-term investment. The city needs to enforce existing laws and go after owners who do not maintatin their properties, whether it be the banks, HUD, corporations or individuals. The city should provide leadership and help each neighborhood help itself to enhance its quality of life. But the city, as well as real estate developers needs to stop pretending that they can create homeowners out of thin air. Instead, the message should be to citizens that homeownership requires a personal financial commitment, not just relaxed lending standards. If all of these homes are vacant and foreclosed, there must be a surplus of housing and in many cases, the homes and/or neighborhoods are not desirible. If so, no amount of government intervention is going to change that fact. The best that the government can do is to focus on improving the quality of life for the remaining residents and ridding these communities of domestic criminals and illegal alien criminals.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Lou Dobbs
I loved your comment in the story about the Mexican government complaining about our border patrol crossing the border while chasing criminals trafficking drugs was classic - Something to the effect that at least this is the first time that the Mexican government acknowledged the sovereign border. The two border agents that are facing jail time is criminal (this story should be in the mainstream press every day instead of the other stupid stories that they bore us to tears with at every waking moment. And what is more irritating is that people like me are called racist (my words don't reveal my complexion) when we ask that our immigration laws be be enforced. Even with total 100% enforcement, our immigration policies are very liberal, but no one wants to admit that. There are literally dozen of ways to legally enter this country, unfortunately for us, their is little to make many of them leave, because the immigration laws are not enforced.
Thank you for bringing this issue to light every night. Sometimes it feels hopeless that anything will change for the better. I recently finished reading your book, "War on the Middle Class." And the title says it all. By the way, the other books I am currently reading are "State of Emergency" by Pat Buchanan; "Take this Job and Ship It, by Senator Byron L. Dorgan and The Diposable American by Louis Uchitelle - Notice a theme.
Civil Rights Poseurs
If the idea of a student union is for students to unite together, why would anyone request or provide a separate student union for one segment of the student population? It makes no sense. And if it really is that important to have a black student union, then these students should figure out how to start a building fund and solicit money from black alumni and others who would be equally supportive of this endeavor. They might find that if they tried to accomplish their objective(s) on their own, others might voluntarily help to achieve those goals.
The reality is that these students have learned, not from the real leaders of the Civil Rights Movement but from the poseurs of the post Civil Rights Era, to whine and cry for selfish reasons instead of fighting for the betterment of society.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)