Amanda - older and wiser

It’s been a long time folks. Yes, it is me, Amanda, still curious as ever; however, I am five years older and in the 11th grade at Princess High School in Prince, IN. Not surprisingly, in light of the current economic situation, we have been learning a lot about the principles of good government; unfortunately, my teacher has had difficulty providing us with recent concrete examples. So, I have been spending a lot of my free time watching the government channel of Indianapolis to find my own examples of good government principles being applied. Ok, I know; I am not a typical teenager. Particularly, I paid attention to a proposal to sell the water company to Citizens Energy. Needless to say it was quite a learning experience. Did you know that Citizens Energy is a public trust (maybe the name should have gave me a clue – duh)?

I have learned that one of the principles of good government is that government should be financed by user fees for all direct services to individuals. Although the idea to transfer water and sewer utilities to Citizens seemed to be almost a no-brainer, I was surprised when I heard that Citizens (remember it is a public trust) would borrow millions of dollars (funded by user fees), to transfer to a public agency (the Department of Public Works of the City of Indianapolis), to fund street and sidewalk infrastructure projects. I was even more surprised that a lot of the Councilors seemed to think it was a good idea. Then the presenters also started talking about bonds being issued against PILOT (payments in lieu of taxes – I think) revenue in such a confusing manner (Wasn’t everyone involved public, so why would taxes even be an issue?); my head started to hurt. One thing that I thought I had learned in school was that user fees and taxes should be clearly applicable to the services rendered, transparent and understandable. I couldn’t figure out why Citizens (public trust) would pay the City (public) so that it could pave streets and build sidewalks instead of just continuing to apply the requisite user fees to sewer, water and gas, respectively.

Anyway, I knew I needed some help, but unfortunately, our civics teacher was out with an illness, but later, on the way to the library, I stumbled across our mayor, Meg A. Mallard. I asked her whether she knew and understood what was going on with the Citizens proposal. She said it really wasn’t that difficult to understand; the Councilors and the City of Indianapolis were just trying to make it sound complicated to hide what they are doing from the general public, who they know (other than a few dedicated folk) don’t have time to stay abreast of everything going on the city. She said that many government officials don’t like to do the things that are easy to understand, because too many people would catch on too quickly and might stop their proposals. So they pretend they are doing creative, wondrous, complicated transactions to prevent the average person from really understanding what is going on until it is too late. Basically, she said that they are attempting to divert user fees from water and sewer ratepayers that would be too difficult to take without the proposed Citizens transfer as a cover. She said the proposal was a classic case of “robbing Peter to pay Paul (I am not sure who Peter and Paul are, but I understand that no one should rob Peter).” She continued by saying that if the City of Indianapolis, or for that matter the State or Federal government does not have adequate funds to repair, pave or construct streets and sidewalks, the proper thing to do would be to propose to raise the gas tax or some other dedicated infrastructure tax or fee to the appropriate level to meet their obligations. But that would be too transparent, so they haven’t done anything for many, many years to address this issue, so there is a shortage of funds to maintain the infrastructure within the right-of-way.

Well, as always, I thanked our small town mayor for helping me understand things a little better. What I have learned from all this is that good government is easy to understand and that bad government is not. So, folks, if you don’t understand what your government is doing, you probably are witnessing bad government. Well, back to Channel 16 to see if I can find some good government in action. There must be some of it somewhere, don’t you think?